NEXUS Criteria
June 13, 2008Emergency Evaluation Of The Pediatric Cervical Spine Cost Effective Tips
June 13, 2008Cost and Time-Effective Strategies:
1. Clinically clear the cervical spine when possible. Avoiding radiographic studies saves not only their cost, but also time in the emergency room.
2. Don’t waste a lot of time or effort on getting the odontoid view. Successful attempts to obtain this view are rare in children under the age of 9 years.
3. If ordering a head CT, consider extending it to include the cervical spine from the occiput to C2. This eliminates the need for an odontoid and guarantees adequate visualization of the area most prone to injury in the small child.
4. If the patient has cervical pain or an abnormality on plain film, consult an expert early. An orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon may have preferences about which further studies will be done. This can prevent redundant or unnecessary imaging.
5. REMEMBER: The cost of a missed injury is far greater than the cost of additional imaging. During the time period from 1997 to 2000, the average hospital bill for a pediatric CSI patient was $57,280, and the average length of hospital stay was 13.47 days.
Emergency Evaluation Of The Pediatric Cervical Spine Risk Management Pitfalls
June 13, 2008Risk Management Pitfalls:
“I didn’t think she needed a cervical collar because she was up and walking around at the scene of the accident.” It is safer to provide cervical spine immobilization until the history can be reviewed, the child can be examined thoroughly, and the appropriate radiographic evaluations can be performed.
“They didn’t have a pediatric backboard in the ambulance, and they forgot to put anything under him. Since he’s already secured on the adult board, we’ll just leave him on it.” Immobilization on an adult backboard with no adjustment to allow for the proportionately greater head and occiput size keeps the cervical spine of a child from being positioned in neutral alignment. The resulting position, with the neck flexed and the chin tucked, can lead to upper airway obstruction.
“She said her neck didn’t hurt, so I thought it was OK to take her out of the collar.” Remember that children will often tell you whatever you want to hear, partly to please you and partly because they don’t want to wear a cervical collar! This is especially true if the child is scared or overwhelmed by the situation. Also, the impact of other distracting injuries can be more challenging to sort out in young children. It is most prudent to leave the collar in place until other injuries have been cared for and the child can be reassured by a more familiar face.
Emergency Evaluation Of The Pediatric Cervical Spine Case Study
June 13, 2008Case Study:
The Friday night shift brings a variety of traumatic injuries. First, a 15-year-old football player tackled the opposing quarterback while leading with his helmet. At the end of the play, he could not stand and stated his arms were tingling and both his legs were numb. Next, a 3-year-old fell down a flight of stairs after tripping on a toy. She is alert and crying but will not allow anyone other than her parents near her. Finally, an 8-year-old is brought in as a trauma alert, following a motor vehicle crash where another passenger was killed at the scene. This boy is unresponsive and is being bag-mask ventilated by the emergency response team.
Each of these children arrives to the emergency department with a cervical-spine-immobilizing collar in place. Despite very different mechanisms, each will require a complete cervical spine evaluation. What is required to safely remove the collar? Could any of these children be clinically cleared? What radiographic studies are indicated? When is expert consultation required?
Case Study Conclusion:
Each of the three patients had a mechanism of injury that required cervical spine evaluation. Neurosurgery was consulted to see the 15 year-old football player. A cervical spine CT demonstrated no bony injury. An urgent MRI demonstrated soft tissue and spinal cord edema. Cervical spine immobilization was continued, and he was admitted for neurological monitoring. At the time he was trans¬ported to his room, the tingling in his arms was subsid¬ing, but his lower extremity deficits persisted.
After some time, the three year old became less distressed and more active. Despite her cervical collar, she was playful and walked to the soda machine with her mom. At that point she cooperated with a physical exam, during which she had no neck tenderness and she demon¬strated a full active range of motion. Her cervical spine was cleared clinically and she was discharged to home.
The 8 year old was admitted to the Pediatric Inten¬sive Care Unit, where an intracranial pressure monitor revealed severe intracranial hypertension. Despite no obvious bony abnormality on plain films, his clinical course prevented MRI evaluation for ligamentous injury within 72 hours of his accident. Therefore, he remained in a cervical collar at the time of transfer to a rehabilitation facility. He was scheduled to follow up with Orthopedics for further evaluation in 6 weeks.

Posted by empracticenews
Posted by empracticenews
Posted by empracticenews